(Observe the instructions of the vehicle manufacturer.) Then connect the negative terminal of the assisting vehicle 3 with 4, the blank metallic point on the vehicle needing assistance, away from the battery. First connect the two positive terminals 1 with 2.When connecting the terminals, both vehicle engines must be switched off!.Only connect batteries with the same nominal voltage.Observe the instructions for use of the starter cables.in accordance with DIN 72 553) should always be used for giving starting assistance. Therefore, it is essential that the following procedure be strictly observed when using starter cables!.Starting assistance from vehicle to vehicle can lead to voltage peaks during disconnection, which can damage or even destroy vehicle electronic systems.At the end of the day, there are a few proprietary transceivers that offer longer distances over multimode fiber, but they aren't SFP optics.In view of the sensitive electronic components in the vehicle, as a rule starting assistance should only be provided by using a starting assist device. Even if then adapted again into SM for the long distance part of a run, the damage (loss) has already been done, so you still won't get LX level performance. Further, even with mode conditioning, LX optics with MM fiber will not translate to LX distances because of the limitations of the fiber, so there's no point in doing it. The entire point of the LRM optic escapes me. 220M is not going to satisfy the requirements of many outside plant links. Even with mode conditioning, it's a bad match which is passively irreconcilable. Why would we want to use 1310nm optics with MM fiber? There's no advantage. So let me ask you a question that's straight to the point that's bothering me about all of this. I just don't get the premise of the scenario I guess. Two posts up, you will see the phrase "laser optimized" in relation to single mode fiber. Multimode was also easier to terminate, though this difference is not significant enough to be relevant. This difference in price has narrowed tremendously, with the advent of solid state semiconductor lasers. The argument for multimode used to be that the optics were significantly cheaper. This would lead to significant signal distortion, as the same signal may be received multiple times, each out of phase with the other. In fact, in a long enough length, you can even end up with some of the light traveling back in the other direction, ultimately producing essentially an optical multi-path propagation effect. Essentially, you will lose more and more of the light, rather than having it propagate properly along the length of the fiber. At those wavelengths, multimode fiber will start to exhibit significant losses due to the critical angles of reflection between the core and the cladding not being correct. If you could use an LED light source in the 1200-1700nm range, single mode fiber would work fine. Different core diameters will carry different wavelengths of light. The light source itself is far less important than the wavelength of light. It costs more, it does less.Īs for calling single mode "laser optimized", that's being generous. My argument about the whole thing is just that I see no reason to use multimode fiber at all. There are also types where a length of one fiber is fused to a length of the other mid way through the cable. They are touchy, and you will want to make sure cleaves are essentially perfect. You put it onto your multimode cable, and snap that into single mode optics. Basically, you have a ferule with a miniature "funnel shaped" glass inside it. Basically, they contain an engineered piece of glass that mates to one size fiber and changes its apparent cross-sectional area in order to create compatibility with the other format.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |